[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [apops] Re: The Mandatory One Reply To This Weeks: The CidrReport
On Wed, 21 Mar 2001, Joe Abley wrote:
> We have been discussing some multi-homing scenarios at the ietf which
> may turn out to correspond in part to the problem telstra is attempting
> to solve. Geoff gave a presentation which describes some of this, which
> you will find at http://www.merit.edu/~ahuja/ (look at the bottom for
> the ptomaine stuff).
I will have to find a powerpoint reader.
> The solution of advertising a large number of prefixes in different
> ways to different adjacent networks is one way of accomplishing the
> policy dissemination; however, one problem is the large amount of
> prefix bloat associated with it that the whole network gets to see.
right. that is correct. i guess i can better understand this if they, the
end user/edge network, would run BGP.
*>i148.182.0.0 209.1.40.63 1000 0 1 16779 1221 i
*>i148.182.16.0/24 209.1.40.63 1000 0 1 16779 1221 ?
*>i148.182.17.0/24 209.1.40.63 1000 0 1 16779 1221 ?
*>i148.182.18.0/24 209.1.40.63 1000 0 1 16779 1221 ?
i have no problems seeing
* i148.182.12.0/22 209.1.220.156 1000 0 5727 1221 4740 4740 4740 4740 i
maybe this goes back to Micro Allocations, which i would like to see
sooner rather than later.
Christian.
----
Network Architect
BENGI - Exodus
AS3967 .us .ca .au AS8709 .eu (.de .uk .nl .fr) AS4197 .jp
* APOPS: Asia Pacific Operations Forum *
* To unsubscribe: send "unsubscribe" to apops-request@apnic.net *
