[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[apnic-talk] 5:100 NR (NAURU)Fw: 0:203 ONLINE...Fw: AE...FM...NR...SZ
http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/domainname/130dftmail/unir.txt
5:100 NR (NAURU)
Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 11:07 AM
Subject: Re: 0:203 ONLINE...Fw: AE...FM...NR...SZ
> John,
>
> Besides staging .ONLINE in all of the various root servers, other than the U.S. Government controlled servers,
> what do you think about the idea to *also* (in addition to) build out .ONLINE under the .NR TLD ? That would
> be the TLD used because O is between the letters N and R. In other words, people would not only get their
> .ONLINE name but also a name of the forme [SLD].ONLINE.nr. This would help to place them in the USG-controlled
> roots, without the bogus claims about putting load on those roots. NR is already in the USG roots, and ONLINE.NR
> appears to be available. Software can easily be tweaked to have look ups done via the ONLINE.nr path, for people
> that are forced to use the USG-controlled roots. This would be similar to the New.Net approach, of giving people
> two names, one in their TLDs, and one under the same TLD.new.net zone. With the NR approach, the extension is
> much smaller and also is somewhat more obscur. People may not mind carrying an extra couple of characters around
> such as "nr", to get into the USG-controlled DNS path.
>
> The proposed ranges would be....AE...FM...NR...SZ....thus having 4 TLD Managers providing "the root" anyone can be in...
>
> Jim Fleming
> 128-bit DNS is closer than you think...
> COM...DE...NET...ORG...INFO...BIZ...US...ONLINE
> http://ipv8.dyndns.tv
> http://ipv8.dyns.cx
> http://ipv8.no-ip.com
> http://ipv8.no-ip.biz
> http://ipv8.no-ip.info
> http://ipv8.myip.us
> http://ipv8.dyn.ee
> http://ipv8.community.net.au
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "John Palmer" <jp@adns.net>
> Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 11:39 PM
> Subject: Re: 0:203 ONLINE...Fw: AE...FM...NR...SZ
>
>
> > The .ONLINE TLD is held by AtlanticRoot. ADNS is the registry operator. .ONLINE is part if the Inclusive Namespace
> > Registry System (INRS) - a shared registry system.
> >
> > The WHOIS for INRS is http://www.adns.net
> >
> > Anyone wishing to become and INRS Registry or Registrar can contact info-inrs@adns.net
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Jim Fleming" <JimFleming@ameritech.net>
> > To: <pg@name-space.com>; "John Palmer" <jp@ADNS.NET>
> > Cc: <yjpark@myepark.com>; <steinle@smartvia.de>; "Richard J. Sexton" <richard@vrx.net>; "Richard Henderson"
> > <richardhenderson@ntlworld.com>; <ray@fassett.org>; <love@cptech.org>; <karl@cavebear.com>; <k@widgital.com>;
> > <jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com>; "Joop Teernstra" <terastra@terabytz.co.nz>; "Joey Borda **star*walker**" <starwalker@gay.com>; "Joe
> > Baptista" <baptista@dot-god.com>; "Joanna Lane" <jo-uk@rcn.com>; <JMKing@ipro.org>; "Jkhan" <Jkhan@MetroMgr.com>;
> > <jefsey@jefsey.com>; <hans.klein@pubpolicy.gatech.edu>; <faia@amauta.rcp.net.pe>; <eric@hi-tek.com>; "Elisabeth Porteneuve"
> > <Elisabeth.Porteneuve@cetp.ipsl.fr>; "Bruce Young" <Bruce@barelyadequate.info>; "Ben Edelman" <edelman@law.harvard.edu>;
> > <andy@ccc.de>; "@quasar Internet Solutions, Inc." <shore@quasar.net>; "Stephen Waters" <swaters@amicus.com>
> > Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 7:55 PM
> > Subject: 0:203 ONLINE...Fw: AE...FM...NR...SZ
> >
> >
> > > Is there a consolidated .ONLINE Registry at this stage ?
> > >
> > > 0:203 ONLINE
> > > http://www.adns.net/NEWS/2002070101.html
> > > http://www.name-space.com
> > >
> > > ONLINE.NR can be used to hook into the legacy root servers as described below...
> > > http://www.cenpac.net.nr/dns/whois.html?subdomain=online&tld=nr&whois=Submit
> > > O is between the letters N and R
> > > [SLD].ONLINE names would also get [SLD].ONLINE.nr
> > > ...the nameservers for the [SLD].ONLINE name would of course be the same...
> > >
> > >
> > > Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 6:11 PM
> > > Subject: AE...FM...NR...SZ
> > >
> > >
> > > > If all of the TLDs are distributed across four domains based on their first-letter of the TLD
> > > > then, it should be very hard for the I* society to make a technical case for potential over-loading
> > > > of the "root servers". Some simple changes can be made to the new software to use the
> > > > following 4 alphabet ranges to distribute the load. As an example, the .CHURCH TLD would
> > > > be under CHURCH.AE because C is between A-E. The .GOD TLD would be under GOD.FM
> > > > and already exists. The .NEWS TLD would be under NEWS.NR and the TRAVEL TLD would
> > > > be under TRAVEL.SZ. With this approach, almost any company can launch a TLD now and
> > > > not be blind-sided by the coming claims that the legacy root-servers are overloaded and can not
> > > > possibly handle any more TLDs.
> > > >
> > > > http://www.uaenic.ae
> > > > AE
> > > > http://www.dot.fm
> > > > FM
> > > > http://www.cenpac.net.nr/dns/index.html
> > > > NR
> > > > http://www.africaonline.co.sz/domreg/
> > > > SZ
> > > > =====
> > >
> > > 0:203 ONLINE....Still the People's Choice...
> > >
> > > http://www.icann.org/comments-mail/icann-current/msg00342.html
> > > 9264 ONLINE - 45,049 matches for -ONLINE
> > > ============================================
> > > http://www.domainsurfer.com/ssearch.cgi?dom=-online.com
> > >
> > >
> > > Jim Fleming
> > > 128-bit DNS is closer than you think...
> > > COM...DE...NET...ORG...INFO...BIZ...US...ONLINE
> > > http://ipv8.dyndns.tv
> > > http://ipv8.dyns.cx
> > > http://ipv8.no-ip.com
> > > http://ipv8.no-ip.biz
> > > http://ipv8.no-ip.info
> > > http://ipv8.myip.us
> > > http://ipv8.dyn.ee
> > > http://ipv8.community.net.au
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
* APNIC-TALK: General APNIC Discussion List *
* To unsubscribe: send "unsubscribe" to apnic-talk-request@apnic.net *
