| | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
You're here: Home |
From: "Andrei Robachevsky" <andrei@ripe.net> "A total of 47 /8's with 8030 records have to be transferred." Was this approved by the ICANN Board ?...or just part of the RIR "Plan A" to proceed no matter what...? http://www.icann.org/minutes/prelim-report-31oct02.htm Which /8s ? http://www.iana.org/assignments/ipv4-address-space (last updated 2002-10-25) http://lacnic.net/en/transition.html > http://www.icann-ncc.org/pipermail/discuss/2002-October/003010.html > RIRs already function quite independently of ICANN, and it's an open question > how they would react to a "no" from the ICANN board. "We have no Plan B, we > are not playing games," APNIC Dir. Gen. Paul Wilson said. "We play straight." > ============================ Jim Fleming 128-bit DNS is closer than you think... http://ipv8.dyndns.tv http://ipv8.dyns.cx http://ipv8.no-ip.com http://ipv8.no-ip.biz http://ipv8.no-ip.info http://ipv8.myip.us http://ipv8.dyn.ee http://ipv8.community.net.au * APNIC-TALK: General APNIC Discussion List * * To unsubscribe: send "unsubscribe" to apnic-talk-request@apnic.net *
