[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [apnic-talk] Status field for inet6num objects
- To: Guy Davies <Guy.Davies@telindus.co.uk>, "'Nigel Titley'" <nigel@titley.com>, Daniel Karrenberg <Daniel.Karrenberg@ripe.net>
- Subject: RE: [apnic-talk] Status field for inet6num objects
- From: Geoff Huston <gih@telstra.net>
- Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2002 22:02:52 +1000
- Cc: Anne Lord <anne@apnic.net>, Joao Luis Silva Damas <joao@ripe.net>, ipv6-wg@ripe.net, lir-wg@ripe.net, db-wg@ripe.net, sig-db@lists.apnic.net, sig-policy@lists.apnic.net, apnic-talk@lists.apnic.net
- In-reply-to: <C653AC166708D51195D600034723D86504C374D6@CAIN>
- Sender: owner-apnic-talk@lists.apnic.net
>I tend to agree with Nigel, although I'd go for something even
>plainer like DELEGATED-TO-LIR and ASSIGNED-TO-END-USER (I know
>they're a bit verbose but they're absolutely clear ;-) It also makes
>clear that addresses assigned to an LIR in the role of END-USER are
>exactly that. That way, an individual who is struggling with English
>as a second language (or even their first language ;-) can be
>absolutely clear of the status of a range of addresses.
For me these two phrases, DELEGATED-TO-LIR and
ASSIGNED-TO-END-USER, hit the spot precisely!
excellent suggestion Guy!
Is it appropriate to request consideration of these terms as replacements
for ASSIGNED and ALLOCATED?
Geoff
* APNIC-TALK: General APNIC Discussion List *
* To unsubscribe: send "unsubscribe" to apnic-talk-request@apnic.net *