[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [apnic-talk] a proposal agendum for policy SIG at Korea
At 04:08 00/02/10 +0900, MAEMURA Akinori wrote:
>It can be self-defined, I mean, the address holder defines
>the POC to register it to the whois database. To track the
>problem with the site you can look up the whois DB and find
>the tPOC, the upstream ISP's POC of the site.
It may be a good idea but maintenance of such data might be difficult
without some force.
>:| What we really need is a way to quickly contact the responsible
>person. It
>:| can be either e-mail, phone, fax or any form, which can be chosen by the
>:| network owner concerned. However, there need to be at least one on a 24
>:| hours basis. Otherwise, it is hard to get quick support when a network is
>:| intentionally, non-intentionally or unknowingly doing harm to other
>networks.
>:|
>Yes, I agree. Let me make sure, do you mean there is no
>need to exhibit the POC at the DB, Obata-san?
Yes, I think so. However, I think there should be a choice for which media
to use.
Yoshi
* APNIC-TALK: General APNIC Discussion List *
* To unsubscribe: send "unsubscribe" to apnic-talk-request@apnic.net *
